deoreox.blogg.se

Pokercruncher vs flopzilla
Pokercruncher vs flopzilla










using the STARR method you can list down specific (real) situations.

  • Indicate how you solved and how you should have solved the problem.
  • Make deadlines for your goals and keep to them.
  • Gather as much reliable sources as you can find for each specific weaknesses.
  • Analyze the information and make a rapport of your findings.
  • Make sure you understand and master the found principles by practicing it over and over again.
  • Do the results indicate the weaknesses are improved? How can you improve them even more? Are there more or new weaknesses which needs improvement? I am sure there will be differences specific to poker improvement which means the method will need some adaptations. I consider myself a MTT trainee (note: i'm only playing online) and as try to push my game. Here's what i do.Īs with everything practice helps.

    pokercruncher vs flopzilla

    But i'm always try to find a balance between buy-in vs quality of play to withstand lots of tourneys where i min-cashed or not at all. I don't really care about the results at this moment. I just use a fixed bankroll able to withstand lots of quality games. I get ITM% around 10+ and that's fine but i'm mostly interesting on problematically played hands after the tourney. As i always try to find reasons to fold, i always try to find reasons to evaluate problematic hands. I'm always trying to fix my worst plays and never really look at my wins or won hands. In addition, i would have also a bigger sample of awkwardly played hands so i can evalute better after the tourneys. Also my plan balances between playing + reading + evaluating. I never, for example, try to read 150 book pages because i want to carve book stuff into my head while playing this stuff. Quality play requires lots of energy and time. I think sharing your day between playing, reading and evaluating in equal will improve one's arsenal overtime and that's logical.

    pokercruncher vs flopzilla

    I like to think myself as a trainee which needs training and games rather results. That also solves the tilt issue, making you a more focusing player.Īlso, when i read books i try to focus or enter the pro's mind for playing a hand. I push myself hard to not fall into that tendency of snap-reading and say ok, next. Trying to grasp the plays, especially from pros close to your own style, really helps your game overtime since the play gets sticked on brain. For example Super System is a book not going to read, ever, regardless it's cult status. I consider myself more of a TAG rather a LAG to read that book so i'm more close to books like anything of Harrington, Winning tournaments one hand at a time and such. In short, getting more selective of books and internet articles will make you better player as well. Also be very careful of advices given by players that play a different style from you.












    Pokercruncher vs flopzilla